there is no single truth about Saipan

History Channel Documentary 

In case you're similar to me, a title like "The Truth About [anything]" is a convincing one that makes you need to peruse more. I trust we as a whole, in some way or another, long to know "reality" about things. Particularly in the event that you've heard differentiating things about existence on Saipan, wouldn't it be decent, for the last time, to get to reality of everything?

In all actuality, be that as it may, there is no single truth about Saipan. In any endeavor to reveal reality about Saipan, what we find are subjective points of view, sentiments and perceptions dictated by individual motivation. A few motivation are basic: (eg. "I had a terrible ordeal on Saipan, so Ii need to make everybody as hopeless as I am"). A few plans are mind boggling. (eg. "We will sort out a government takeover, reshape the island in our picture, and make this a R&R [rest and relaxation] spot for the troops.")

Indeed, even the news media, which should be unbiased, has a plan. Individuals regularly joke that the media's witticism is "Never given reality a chance to hinder a decent story!" at the end of the day, a "great" (i.e. lecherous) story offers papers, magazines and publicizing. In this way, we should recount an anecdote about Saipan that highlights the debasement. Yes, "truth" changes in view of who is talking and whether Saipan is a "Pacific heaven" or a "nook of defilement" is all taking into account who you listen to and what their plan is.

In any case, the greater part of that is fine, in light of the fact that once you know a man's plan, then all that they say and do bodes well in that connection. Also, in the event that you know a man's plan, then you won't be unduly deluded by their cases to "truth." With that said, I ought to let you know MY motivation.